5/7/2023 0 Comments What is the opposite of lazy![]() 568), and they fail to offer genuine evidence (Kuhn, 1991). When asked to justify their points of view, many participants can only generate arguments that make “superficial sense” (Perkins, 1985, p. The later has been comparatively neglected, but is well supported by the existing evidence. The first trait of argument production-the confirmation bias or myside bias-has been the topic of much attention (see, e.g., Nickerson, 1998). Second, these arguments tend to be relatively weak. ![]() First, they mostly find arguments for their own side. The way people produce arguments is doubly problematic. ![]() This demonstrates that people are more critical of other people's arguments than of their own, without being overly critical: They are better able to tell valid from invalid arguments when the arguments are someone else's rather than their own. Moreover, participants were more likely to reject their own arguments for invalid than for valid answers. Among those participants who accepted the manipulation and thus thought they were evaluating someone else's argument, more than half (56% and 58%) rejected the arguments that were in fact their own. Unknown to the participants, in one of the trials, they were presented with their own argument as if it was someone else's. In two experiments, participants had to produce a series of arguments in response to reasoning problems, and they were then asked to evaluate other people's arguments about the same problems. ![]() To demonstrate this “selective laziness,” we used a choice blindness manipulation. Reasoning research suggests that people use more stringent criteria when they evaluate others' arguments than when they produce arguments themselves.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |